Skip to main content

Green Hour

I. SUMMARY INFORMATION
Project
304323
Status
Submitted
Award category
Reconnecting with nature
You want to submit
NEW EUROPEAN BAUHAUS AWARDS: existing completed examples
Project title
Green Hour
Full project title
Green Hour: nature-based activities for an active ageing
Description

‘Green Hour’ aimed to promote an active ageing, by implementing regular nature-based activities, targeting the local community seniors, including vulnerable groups (> 65 years old and also those with reduced mobility, dementia, Alzheimer, impaired vision etc.). ‘Green Hour’ designed and developed tailor made activities, according to the specific needs of each sub-group and delineated according to the natural surrounding Natura 2000 context. 

What was the geographical scope of your project?
Local
Esposende Municipality
Viana do Castelo Municipality
North region
Does your project address mainly urban or rural issues?
It addresses urban-rural linkages
Does your project refer to a physical transformation of the built environment or other types of transformations?
It refers to other types of transformations ('soft investment')
Has your project benefited from EU programmes or funds?
No
Has your project won an EU prize?
No
Your project is fully completed?
Yes
When was your project implemented?
How did you hear about the New European Bauhaus Prizes ?
Social media
On whose behalf are you submitting the application?
As a representative of an organisation
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
Please provide a summary of your project

The ‘Green Hour’ project conceived, developed and deployed a diversity of nature-based activities aiming to stimulate mental dexterity, memory, creativity, fine motor skills, and social interaction. The ultimate goal was to promote well-being and alleviate feelings of isolation. 

 

This was achieved by directly engaging:

- seniors living on their own and more active, but still in need of a support local network; 

- vulnerable seniors under the care of local social charities (i.e. day care centres).

 

A set of activities were designed according to the specific needs of the target-group, focusing on outdoors nature activities, and one-on-one home activities for specific needs when required. 

 

These activities were divided according to 5 complementary strands:

- Sensorial experiences (sensorial garden co-creation, workshops, …);

- Nature sports (adapted river kayak, walking trails…);

- Biodiversity experiences (fauna and flora observation, …);

- Community environment (seed planting, arboretum co-creation, …);

- Biodiversity toolkit boxes (learning and sharing, observation, problem-solving, …).

 

The project achieved considerable success, based on its positive impact and continued high demand, well beyond what was initially expected. Indeed, the initial plan was to work in partnership with one social charity, but at the end we regularly worked with 12. A total of 282 seniors participated in the activities, with an average of 120 weekly participations. 

 

The project was implemented by Rio Neiva - Environmental NGO, in Esposende and Viana do Castelo municipalities, in northern Portugal. The project team included 1 biologist, 1 biologist and illustrator, and 1 project manager, which worked together with social charities staff.

 

Please indicate the main themes of your project with 5 key words
Nature-based
Active ageing
Seniors
Local biodiversity
Participation
Please give information about the key objectives of your project in terms of sustainability (including circularity) and how these have been met.
Please highlight how the project can be exemplary in this context

The sustainability principle is grounded in:

- focus on the existing Natura 2000 local biodiversity by raising awareness and knowledge;

- implementing nature-based activities, placing seniors in direct contact with nature, and promoting direct action for the local territory sustainable development (i.e. tree planting, building insect-houses, etc.;

- using locally-sourced and reused materials for all activities (i.e. collecting invasive species, planting and using own aromatics, card boxes, etc.).

 

Please give information about the key objectives of your project in terms of aesthetics and quality of experience beyond functionality and how these have been met.
Please highlight how the project can be exemplary in this context

The aesthetics and quality of experience principle is grounded in:

- tailor-made activities based on ‘gaming principles’, namely interactivity, meaningful experiences, engagement of senses, and playfullness;

- developing a clear narrative on biodiversity, translated into a clear set of pratical activities instructions and materials, ready-to-use; 

- using illustration techniques as a central feature in the project and its activities, thus enhaning their attractiveness, recognition and experience.

 

Please give information about the key objectives of your project in terms of inclusion (equal opportunities, public participation, citizen engagement, co-design, universal design, accessibility, affordability, etc.) and how these have been met.
Please highlight how the project can be exemplary in this context

The inclusion principle is grounded in:

- focusing on local community seniors (over 65 years old, including those with reduced mobility, dementia, Alzheimer, impaired vision etc.);

- working alongside with local social charities, both on co-design and delivery of activities;

- developing tailor-made and accessible activities to the specific needs of the target-group;

- developing low-cost solutions in terms of materials, offered at no cost to social charities and the target-group.

 

Please explain how these three dimensions have been combined in your project.
Please highlight how this approach can be exemplary

The three dimensions / principles converged together through the set of activities, as all of them are nature-based, delineated according to the surrounding natural context, focusing on local seniors, aiming to promote positive experiences to each one.

Please give information on the results/impacts achieved by your project in relation to the category you apply for

The project impact was assessed throughout its implementation through a set of global indicators and also through a set of indicators related to the well-being of the target-group. This last set of indicators were developed together with the social charities staff:

- Total of 282 participating seniors (essentially distributed by 120 weekly participations);

- Total of 2049 nature contact hours;

- Average of 7,3 nature contact hours per senior;

- Increased awareness on the local rich biodiversity;

- Increased protection of natural context (i.e. tree planting, invasive species reduction, etc.);

- Partnership with 12 local social charities;

- Increase of well-being feeling in 80% of all participants;

- Increase of social interaction feelings in 70% of all participants;

- Increase of fine motricity skills in 70% of all participants;

- Reduction of depressive and isolation feelings in all home on-site participant visits.

 

Please explain how citizens and civil society were involved in the in the design and/or implementation of the project.
Please also explain the benefits that derived from their involvement.

The ‘Green Hour’ project was conceived and implemented by an Environmental NGO, as a well-grounded community-level organisation, founded in 1989 and still managed by local citizens for/with local citizens. 

In turn, all project activities focused on the local senior population (>65 years old), responding to a variety of needs and motivations.

A set of activities were initially pre-defined, according to the previously mentioned strands, and were further developed and fine-tuned according to participants feedback. They were also fine-tuned according to existing COVID-19 restrictions at each time, thus responding to specific needs of the target-group in this respect. 

The project also set itself working on an learning-by-doing approach, by first testing each prototype activity in one social charity and then roll-out to all other 11 social charities, happening on a bi-weekly basis. It should be noted that, in Portugal and these ones in particular, social charities are civil-society led, non-profit associations.

 

Please explain what kind of global challenges the project addressed by providing local solutions

With this project we therefore focused on three problems:

- the increased isolation faced by local community seniors, even if they are more active and independent, taking into account the COVID-19 impact on their lifes; 

- the mental and physical health fragilities of the most vulnerable seniors, namely those in need of daily care support (i.e. dementia, restricted mobility, etc.); and

- the time and resources restrictions faced by social charities staff, which need to focus on providing basic social support, leaving them with no possibilities to provide additional activities that can benefit their senior users.

 

Please highlight the innovative character of the project as compared to mainstream practices in the field of the project.

We believe the innovative character of the project lies in the following aspects:

- methodologically structured approach to connect natural immersion with social needs of a local seniors; 

- partnership between a community-level environmental NGO (promotor and implementer) with local social charities;

- developing creative ‘biodiversity boxes’ with ready-to-use problem-solving activities either by social charities staff or by the promoter; 

- devising of complementary ‘low-cost’ activities tailor-made to the existing natural surrounding offer and tailor made to the specific needs of each senior (i.e. activities designed according to their mobility restrictions, dementia, etc.); and

- creation of new and innovative offers of activities to social charities, thus effectively increasing their existing portfolio, also taking into account they were offered at no cost to all participants and social charities.

 

Please explain to the potential of transferring the projects’ results or learnings to other interested parties and contexts.
Please provide clear documentation, communication of methodology and principles in this context.

The project results have the potential for replicability, taking into account that:

- each activity follows a set of written clear and ready-to-use instructions, currently in Portuguese, that can be used in other contexts and duly translated;

- the project identity and illustrations are also openly available;

- materials can be locally-sourced and can be adapted to each natural context;

- activities can also be easily adjusted to different local biodiversity contexts (i.e. different bird species in the bio bingo game, etc.).

 

Is an evaluation report or any relevant documentation available?
If you would like to upload additional documentation, please upload it or write it below

Additional documentation is a sample of the activities instruction manuals, as developed for the project, highlighting the illustrations and how illustrations support them. 

III. UPLOAD PICTURES
IV. VALIDATION
By ticking this box, you declare that you are not in in one or more of the exclusion situations foreseen under Article 136 of the Financial Regulation.
Yes
By ticking this box, you declare that all the information provided in this form is factually correct, that you assume sole liability in the event of a claim relating to the activities carried out in the framework of the contest, that the proposed project has not been proposed for the New European Bauhaus Prizes 2022 in any other category or strand and that it has not been subject to any type of investigation, which could lead to a financial correction because of irregularities or fraud.
Yes
By submitting your application, you guarantee that you are the author or have the rights to proceed with the application and to authorise the use of the project, concept, idea, and that you have obtained any necessary consents, licenses or assignments from third parties and included copyright notices when necessary.
Yes
By submitting your application, you understand that all the applications that meet the eligibility requirements will be shared for the purposes of the selection processes, and notably published on the secured platform https://prizes.new-european-bauhaus.eu/ and for the purposes of the promotion of these on the New European Bauhaus website and/or other European Commission communication channels. In this sense, the applications would be widely available. Applicants should ensure that they present their ideas, concepts, projects, in such a way that they could be shared without giving rise to intellectual property related concerns. If your submission is selected as one of the finalists, it will additionally be shared for the purpose of the public vote that will take place. The European Union is granted a licence to use and share your application with the general public and the official external experts for the purposes of the selection process, including the voting. The European Union has the right to use the images and visual materials and the description provided in the application for communication purposes related to the contest and beyond. Rights granted comprise the right to store, reproduce, display, publish and communicate or distribute copies in electronic or digital format, including, but not only, through the internet. Unless you have disclosed your name, the European Commission has no obligation to share your name when using or disseminating your contribution to the public. The European Union cannot be held responsible in case any submitted idea, project, concept is found to infringe third parties rights. The European Union shall be neither responsible for the use that third parties may do of the applications or related content.
Yes

Attention

In order to submit your project, please make sure you have filled in all the mandatory fields marked with *, in both the “Basic information” and “Description of the project” tabs.

Attention

The country you have selected is not a Member State of the EU.

Please select the country your project was either implemented in the EU for strand A in or is being developed or intended to be implemented in the EU for strand B.