Skip to main content


Award category
Prioritising the places and people that need it the most
You want to submit
NEW EUROPEAN BAUHAUS AWARDS: existing completed examples
Project title
Full project title
Care and Living in Community

CALICO is a cohousing project of 34 dwellings offering a generational and social mix in interaction with the neighborhood. Its priorities are gender equality, welcoming birth and end-of-life facilities at the heart of living together, an innovative community-base model of care, and access to housing within the framework of a Community Land Trust, i.e. a plot of land managed as a common good.


What was the geographical scope of your project?
Brussels Capital Region
Does your project address mainly urban or rural issues?
Mainly urban
Does your project refer to a physical transformation of the built environment or other types of transformations?
It refers to a physical transformation of the built environment ('hard investment')
Has your project benefited from EU programmes or funds?
Which or fund(s)? Provide the name of the programme(s)/fund(s), the strand/action line as relevant and the year.
ERDF: European Regional Development Fund

Urban Innovative Actions, 2018.

Has your project won an EU prize?
Your project is fully completed?
When was your project implemented?
How did you hear about the New European Bauhaus Prizes ?
Word of mouth (colleagues, friends …)
On whose behalf are you submitting the application?
As a representative of an organisation, in partnership with other organisations
Please provide a summary of your project

CALICO is a cohousing project of 34 dwellings offering a generational and social mix and is developed within the common and anti-speculative framework of a “Community Land Trust”. It also integrates an innovative community-based model of care. It is the result of a collaboration between different housing actors, local and regional authorities, and academic partners. The housing project is organized in 3 clusters:

- The “gender” cluster rents dwellings to older women and single mothers. Subsequently, the initiators and residents of this cluster are responsible for putting gender issues at the center of our housing project through awareness-raising and training activities on gender equality issues;

- The "Community Land Trust" cluster sells dwellings to low-income families and rents to older people (+55yo) unable to obtain mortgages. They also provide two housing units dedicated to Housing First for homeless people ; On top of managing one housing cluster, the CLT owns the land of the whole housing project, thus guaranteeing its permanent affordability;

- The "care" cluster not only offers intergenerational cooperative dwellings, but also a birth and end-of-life facility, integrated within the housing clusters, that provides adequate spaces for people wishing to give birth or die in an empathetic and familiar environment. This cluster’s purpose is to create a benevolent living space in Brussels, open to its environment, designed to welcome anyone who wishes to live these «life passages» naturally, in harmony and in connection with others, accompanied by professionals and volunteers.

Furthermore, one common space is open to residents and one is managed as a meeting place for people with mental health issues and where local initiatives are held, therefore CALICO will be a full-fledged player in the local urban fabric.

The multi-committee governance scheme of the project aims at empowering the residents by putting them at the heart of the decision-making.

Please indicate the main themes of your project with 5 key words
life cycles
Please give information about the key objectives of your project in terms of sustainability (including circularity) and how these have been met.
Please highlight how the project can be exemplary in this context

- Land Stewardship as guiding principle: One of the key ideas behind this project is the fact that it considers land as a common good. By separating ownership of the land from the ownership of the building, and by managing that land as a commons, the CLT model guarantees permanent affordability. The multi stakeholder governance model also guarantees the continued alignment of the use of land with the needs of future generations.

- Passive building and training: As of 2015, Brussels became the first region in the world to require the passive house standard for all new construction, thus contributing to a sharp decline in carbon emissions. However, studies have shown that very often, especially in social housing context, much of the energy gain is lost by an incorrect use of the building. That's why we organised several specific training sessions and tools to help the residents use their passive house technology in the most optimal way.  

- Sharing as a way of life: the cohousing approach makes sharing easier. Residents started collecting food waste for organising a weekly community kitchen, and there are plans to set up an organised sharing scheme among residents.

- Sustainable mobility: Bicycle lessons have been set up by CLTB residents in order to teach other, mainly migrant women,) how to ride a bike.

- Community garden: the residents will be in charge of managing the community garden at the heart of the housing project

- Workshops ecological painting: As explained further on, due to the very sharp timeline of the EU Urban Innovative Action call that financed the project, we were constrained to buy a housing development that already received a building permit, and so it was not possible to have major influence on the building techniques. We could only decide over the finishing techniques, for example workshops ecological painting were organised with the residents.

Please give information about the key objectives of your project in terms of aesthetics and quality of experience beyond functionality and how these have been met.
Please highlight how the project can be exemplary in this context

Community Land Trust Brussels developed an exemplary approach towards involving future residents in the design of its housing projects. In the case of the CALICO project, it was impossible to apply this methodology, as the Urban Innovative Action program required the projects to be delivered within three years. In order to deliver a housing project within this short deadline, we looked for a project in development, that met enough requirements to turn it into the project we dreamed of, within the public procurement rules. After an intensive market exploration, analyses and evaluation, we selected the "Les Sources" project. The project is part of a larger housing development in the municipality of Forest and represents a high-quality residential building. The most interesting features to turn it into a vibrant cohousing project were the large semi-public porch at the center, leading to a community garden and creating access to one of the community spaces on the ground floor. Both the porch and the garden act as meeting places for the broader community.

Once we selected the building, we organised co-creation workshops with future residents to adapt the existing project as much as possible to the needs of their cohousing project. As a result, we were able to transform two apartments into meeting spaces (one reserved for the CALICO residents, another one managed as a meeting place for people with mental health issues and activities open to the wider community), and two other apartments into the birth and end-of-life facilities. Although the project would probably have been very different if residents could have been involved in the design process beforehand, the result meets the needs of the community and is an example of how a classical housing project can be transformed into a well-functioning cohousing project.

Please give information about the key objectives of your project in terms of inclusion (equal opportunities, public participation, citizen engagement, co-design, universal design, accessibility, affordability, etc.) and how these have been met.
Please highlight how the project can be exemplary in this context

Since the beginning of the project, all three housing clusters have applied the co-design and participation system already used by the Community Land Trust Brussels. This implies co-design and participation with the (future) residents from day one with the objective of empowering them and involving them in the decision-making process. Throughout the project, attention was also paid to the wider public participation and their ideas, needs, concerns regarding the development of CALICO

One of our main objectives is providing affordable and qualitative housing through the CLT-model, i.e. by separating the ownership of the land from the ownership of the housing built on it, as well as an anti-speculative resale formula.

Adjoining this, specific measures have been taken to ensure an intergenerational and social mix of the residents, as well as to provide housing for (older) women and single parent-families. Due to the unequal access to affordable quality housing, CALICO focuses on three vulnerable groups in particular: older people, (single) women and people with a migration background. These people face particular difficulties in finding affordable and quality housing due to their socio-economic and health background. Two homes are devoted to Housing First for the homeless.

CALICO also wants to contribute to care and wellbeing through the development of a ‘Community Care Model’. In response to the hyper-specialized and -sectorialised care in Belgium, CALICO joins a more general movement of ‘socialization’ of care, where care for people with health problems or disabilities is organised more within the neighborhood (instead of within institutions), but also by (members of) the neighborhood. The project puts community back at the center of the process of care of the different life stages, being birth, older age and end of life. As a result, specific attention is also to ‘age in place’, although the home environment in Brussels often do not meet their needs.

Please explain how these three dimensions have been combined in your project.
Please highlight how this approach can be exemplary

Within the context of an existing housing development, the project is exemplary in the field of:
- a non-speculative approach to ownership: Not only is the project developed on community land, using the community land trust model, two housing cooperatives have been created to hold part of the building. Never before in Brussels both non-speculative tenure models have been combined;
- social inclusion of migrants, older adults, vulnerable women and the homeless: There is a strong intergenerational and cultural mix, with a strong representation of the most vulnerable groups, those who are the most excluded from appropriate and affordable housing in the city;
- community care: We developed an adapted community care model, based on solidarity between residents. The innovative Birth and End-of-life facilities as well as the meeting space for people with mental health issues are part of this model, but also have a regional dimension.
- Fight gender inequality by putting the gender dimension at the heart of a housing project;
- Develop a community led governance model: Care and Governance groups, as well as different workshops, will guarantee a continuous management of CALICO objectives. Residents are trained in governing and management techniques, to enable them to manage the buildings and sustain a vibrant community.
- Building a resilient community, by providing shared spaces and promoting a sustainable lifestyle among vulnerable groups.
Through all these dimensions, the project aims to setting the example for a new approach to urban development and housing. By closely involving local and regional authorities and academic partners, the project aims
to develop new ways of living together and new opportunities for project development, in order to learn lessons and apply them in regional policy.

Please give information on the results/impacts achieved by your project in relation to the category you apply for

The results of the project are numerous and were monitored by setting up a research design using a mixed-method approach, including both quantitative and qualitative methods. First of all, CALICO provides stable, affordable housing in a caring environment to 34 households, 2/3 of which are low-income. Inclusive and diverse, the project has targeted specific needs of older adults, of single women and mothers, and of homeless people. The project is intergenerational (50% of the inhabitants are over 50) and multicultural (50% of the inhabitants have a migration background).

Gender approach and Care are at the heart of the design of the cohousing project. Most inhabitants access the project via a commitment to a feminist perspective and/or a voluntary commitment to care structures integrated into the housing. These original allocation procedures open new perspectives for the definition of empowering public housing policy based on the support of community intentions. Furthermore, the care dimension is realized by the integration of a birth and end-of-Life facility managed by the inhabitants as well as by the realization of a common space between inhabitants and the neighbourhood. Also, 78,8% of the residents consider that they have had the opportunity to establish a relationship of mutual support and solidarity with one or more CALICO participants.

Participation, citizen engagement and co-designing the project were key. Numerous meetings were held to organise this complex governance of the project: around 165 meetings between partners, around 100 at cluster level and 32 between all the inhabitants took place. The participation rate of the inhabitants in the meetings involving them was very high (around 75% on average), especially given the pandemic situation. 87,9% of the residents have declared that they have felt that their views have been considered in setting up the project.

Please explain how citizens and civil society were involved in the in the design and/or implementation of the project.
Please also explain the benefits that derived from their involvement.

CALICO started as a bottom-up project. It builds on a citizens action in which Brussels activists and actors from civil society explored new ways of urban development and of building affordable housing, based on the principles of the Commons.

These partners (including NGOs and cohousing groups) reached out to the Regional authority as well as to academic partners to co-develop a project within the EU UIA-call. They involved other associations and community groups from the surrounding community in the project development. For example, during thematical "strategic committees" a wide range of peer organisations and experts were involved in co-construction of the care, gender and governance dimension of the project. In order to gain insights on the community level, also in-depth interviews were held with 39 residents living in the surrounding of the CALICO project.

From the start of the project, the initiators of the three housing clusters set up an allocation process of the homes to be able to involve future residents as soon as possible in the project design.

A long series of co-design and training workshops with the future residents has been set up, both within the own cluster as with the three clusters together. In these workshops, decisions about the use and management of shared spaces, a community charter, a governance structure, and a community care model have been designed. The residents will be in charge of managing the building and sustaining community life.

Over the course of the project, the initial partnership has been widened. CALICO entered a partnership with Rézone, a regional mental health network, who developed a bonding space”, open space for anyone and conceived as a safe space for people with mental health issues. Furthermore, CALICO started working with local neighborhood committees, with organisations active in the field of soft mobility, community kitchens, and many more.

This approach will form the basis of a resilient community.

Please explain what kind of global challenges the project addressed by providing local solutions

The main urban challenge we are faced with is a housing crisis that particularly affects vulnerable groups, such as low-income and/or single-parent families, migrants and (older) women. Brussels region has a shortage in social housing (long waiting lists), low quality housing in general (many dwellings lack basic facilities) and an increase in real estate prices and rent. Often, households spend over 60% of their income on housing.

A second challenge is the housing situation and the quality of life of specific vulnerable groups. The region confronted with an ageing population that increasingly needs support and often find themselves isolated. Seniors are motivated by policy to ‘‘age in place’’. Unfortunately, some home environments are unfavorable, because the “fit” or “liveability” does not match changing needs. Inadequate homes form a risk for the health, wellbeing, and the independence of older people.

Women, particularly older women, face a higher risk of social isolation and poverty because of their low pensions or income. And also people with migration background are heavily discriminated in the private housing market.

Low-income families experience several challenges in the housing market. They are more present in disadvantaged neighborhoods, tend to live in overcrowded housing, spend a high amount of their income on housing (at the cost of other expenses such as food, healthcare, education).

On top of that, these vulnerable groups are often excluded from decision-making processes within the public sphere, thus lacking the empowering potential of participation.

The final challenge is the need and strong focus on community care, which refers to a growing paradigm shift in which care for people in need becomes less institutionalised, and increasingly becomes the responsibility of civil society. The paradigm shift entails that care takes place within and by the community, as opposed to institutionalisation.

Please highlight the innovative character of the project as compared to mainstream practices in the field of the project.

The innovation lies in the articulation of a mixed financing, governance scheme associating CLT, cooperatives, non-profits and residents, the legal framework for the CLT and the interaction with the neighborhood.

The innovation of the project lies mainly in the integrated approach it intends to implement. It aims to develop a new governance model for community-led housing. This new model should integrate issues of empowerment, social inclusion, gender equity, wellbeing and health care, intercultural dialogue, solidarity and community engagement, as well as sustainability issues by both guarantying a permanent affordability of the housing and collectively managing the land.

Though the CLT-model isn’t new, we’re providing an intergenerational mixture of owner-occupied and rental housing developed under innovative cooperative schemes.

In order to provide affordable and qualitative housing, not only the land, but also the collective spaces were purchased by the CLTBrussels, guaranteeing that the housing units stay permanently affordable.

The project also combines different forms of tenures. The units are made available on long-term leases to owner occupiers or rented mainly by vulnerable households. In the case of renting by households under the conditions of access to social housing, the rental management will be handled by the social rental estate agency (AIS) "Housing for all", partner of the project.
The rental units are owned and financed by an investment cooperative, but the care cluster housing units are owned by a cooperative that includes residents' shares in the financial scheme.

Beyond supervised access to decent housing, the project intends to support the emancipation of residents through participation processes and develop a real community care philosophy including services open to the wider neighborhood.

Incorporating birth and end-of-life facilities, and therefore encompassing the entire lifecycle, into a cohousing project is a world first.

Please explain to the potential of transferring the projects’ results or learnings to other interested parties and contexts.
Please provide clear documentation, communication of methodology and principles in this context.

Being funded by UIA, knowledge transfer, scaling-up and transferability are a requirement.

Project results are therefore shared at different levels (local, regional and international) and in different ways (research reports, popularising and practice-oriented articles, participating in conferences, website, etc). For the dissemination, we closely cooperate with an academic partner and we also rely on the existing networks of the project partners. A selection from documentation and communication actions to disseminate project results:

1. The monitoring and evaluation of the CALICO project is performed by researchers of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Four reports on project results (using a mixed-method study design) will be published:

  • A first initiatory report (2019) provided the groundwork for the evaluation and monitoring of the CALICO-project;
  • A second report published (2020) provided an intermediate evaluation;
  • A third report (2022) provides results from the second and final evaluation;
  • A fourth report entails final concluding remarks and evidence-based recommendations for policy and practice that touch upon various policy areas such as housing, community-led strategies, Community Care strategies, gender mainstreaming approaches, … and social cohesion.

2. Results, governance models and lessons learned are disseminated to other European cities and supra-local governments, by the various networks project partners are involved in. For example, dissemination will notably be supported by the SHICC EU partners to also reach their network. This is done, for example, through active participation in conferences (e.g. European Network on Housing Research), inclusion of CALICO in newsletters, contributions to new project proposals, and actively formulating proposals for new housing policies, etc.

The dissemination of these results will support the development of future initiatives in Europe and around the world.

Is an evaluation report or any relevant documentation available?
If you would like to upload additional documentation, please upload it or write it below
By ticking this box, you declare that you are not in in one or more of the exclusion situations foreseen under Article 136 of the Financial Regulation.
By ticking this box, you declare that all the information provided in this form is factually correct, that you assume sole liability in the event of a claim relating to the activities carried out in the framework of the contest, that the proposed project has not been proposed for the New European Bauhaus Prizes 2022 in any other category or strand and that it has not been subject to any type of investigation, which could lead to a financial correction because of irregularities or fraud.
By submitting your application, you guarantee that you are the author or have the rights to proceed with the application and to authorise the use of the project, concept, idea, and that you have obtained any necessary consents, licenses or assignments from third parties and included copyright notices when necessary.
By submitting your application, you understand that all the applications that meet the eligibility requirements will be shared for the purposes of the selection processes, and notably published on the secured platform and for the purposes of the promotion of these on the New European Bauhaus website and/or other European Commission communication channels. In this sense, the applications would be widely available. Applicants should ensure that they present their ideas, concepts, projects, in such a way that they could be shared without giving rise to intellectual property related concerns. If your submission is selected as one of the finalists, it will additionally be shared for the purpose of the public vote that will take place. The European Union is granted a licence to use and share your application with the general public and the official external experts for the purposes of the selection process, including the voting. The European Union has the right to use the images and visual materials and the description provided in the application for communication purposes related to the contest and beyond. Rights granted comprise the right to store, reproduce, display, publish and communicate or distribute copies in electronic or digital format, including, but not only, through the internet. Unless you have disclosed your name, the European Commission has no obligation to share your name when using or disseminating your contribution to the public. The European Union cannot be held responsible in case any submitted idea, project, concept is found to infringe third parties rights. The European Union shall be neither responsible for the use that third parties may do of the applications or related content.


In order to submit your project, please make sure you have filled in all the mandatory fields marked with *, in both the “Basic information” and “Description of the project” tabs.


The country you have selected is not a Member State of the EU.

Please select the country your project was either implemented in the EU for strand A in or is being developed or intended to be implemented in the EU for strand B.